Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Theoretical study on percutaneous absorption of olmesartan medoxomil: The pH control effect

Chika J Mbah, Chinwe M Onah , Queendalyn E Asogwa

Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria;

For correspondence:-  Chinwe Onah   Email: onah.chinwe@unn.edu.ng

Accepted: 23 November 2021        Published: 30 December 2021

Citation: Mbah CJ, Onah CM, Asogwa QE. Theoretical study on percutaneous absorption of olmesartan medoxomil: The pH control effect. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(12):2463-2468 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i12.1

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To predict the percutaneous absorption of olmesartan medoxomil using dermal parameters obtained under pH control.
Methods: Partition coefficient of olmesartan medoxomil was determined in a chloroform-buffer system by shake flask method at room temperature. The test was carried out under different pH conditions. Established mathematical equations were utilized to calculate percutaneous absorption parameters, including the permeability coefficient of the drug through the skin, maximum flux through the skin, activation energy involved in the partitioning of the drug in the chloroform-buffer system, and diffusion coefficient of the drug through skin. 
Results: At pH 2.0, the drug gave the highest logarithm partition coefficient when compared to other pH values investigated as well as distilled water (control). The mean logarithm partition coefficient of the drug (4.36 ± 0.06) at pH 2.0 compared well to the mean logarithm partition coefficient of the drug (4.15 ± 0.07) in distilled water at 95 % level. Statistical analysis indicated that null hypothesis was rejected at this confidence level. Test of significance was not carried out on the other parameters including maximum flux, activation energy and diffusion coefficient data because they were estimated from the experimental partition coefficient.
Conclusion: Percutaneous absorption of olmesartan medoxomil using dermal parameters obtained under pH control can be predicted. As the rate of penetration into the skin is quantitatively assessed by the use of permeability coefficient, the results predict significant percutaneous absorption of olmesartan medoxomil.

Keywords: Percutaneous absorption, pH control, Olmesartan medoxomil, Skin penetration, Activation energy

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates